jordansangalang.com

Tag: Deaf Leadership

  • ‘Nothing About Us Without Us’: Why AI Accessibility Demands Deaf Leadership

    Author's Note

    This article was originally published on DeafDots on June 5, 2026.

    As the original author, I am republishing it here on my personal blog to make the content accessible to my audience and to continue the conversation around artificial intelligence, accessibility, and Deaf leadership.

    Original publication details:

    Title: "Nothing About Us Without Us: Why AI Accessibility Demands Deaf Leadership"

    Author: Jordan Sangalang, Local Journalism Initiative Reporter

    Originally published by DeafDots on June 5, 2026.

    The article below appears substantially as originally published, with only minor formatting adjustments made for this website.

    By Jordan Sangalang, Local Journalism Initiative Reporter

    As artificial intelligence rapidly embeds itself into Canadian infrastructure—influencing everything from automated workplace tools to emergency alert systems—advocates warn that a major digital divide is forming. Without deliberate intervention, the technology risks leaving behind millions of disabled Canadians.

    Jeffrey Beatty, Chairperson of the Deaf Wireless Canada Consultative Committee (DWCC), is stepping forward to outline the immense opportunities and steep systemic risks AI introduces to the daily lives of Deaf, DeafBlind, and Hard of Hearing (DDBHH) Canadians.

    Speaking strictly from a public accessibility policy perspective, Beatty emphasizes that the rise of AI is fundamentally shifting the landscape of human rights and communication access.

    “For Deaf, DeafBlind, and Hard of Hearing Canadians, this is not just a technology issue,” Beatty states. “It is an accessibility, language, and rights issue.”

    A Tool for Efficiency, Not an Authority

    In his daily policy and advocacy work, Beatty actively leverages AI tools. He uses them to process large quantities of public information concerning telecommunications, regulatory captioning requirements, and digital services.

    “They help me organize information, summarize long documents, improve writing clarity, prepare notes, and compare complex public information,” Beatty explains. He views the technology as a valuable asset for parsing dense, multi-layered regulatory frameworks.

    However, Beatty is quick to draw a hard line between a tool that assists human capability and one that replaces it.

    “I do not treat AI as the final authority. AI can make mistakes, miss context, or give information that sounds confident but is wrong. AI supports the work. It does not replace DDBHH people.”

    For Beatty, the final judgment on any policy piece must remain rooted in human expertise, community accountability, and the lived realities of the DDBHH community.

    The Limitations of Text and Audio-Centric Design

    While text-generation models can streamline administrative tasks or translate complex legalese into plain language, Beatty notes that current mainstream AI design suffers from a deep-seated auditory bias.

    “My biggest concern is that many AI tools are still built around hearing people, speech, audio, and written English,” Beatty says. This structural bias means that users of American Sign Language (ASL), Langue des signes québécoise (LSQ), and Indigenous Sign Languages (ISLs) are frequently excluded or fundamentally misunderstood by modern algorithms.

    True communication access extends far beyond basic English text transcription. Sign languages are distinct, complete languages featuring complex spatial structures and cultural nuances.

    “Many Deaf people use ASL, LSQ, or ISLs which include visual grammar, facial expression, movement, space, and culture. AI tools must respect that,” Beatty says. He notes that poorly trained models regularly generate inaccurate captions, broken translations, or digital avatars that completely fail to replicate real sign language syntax.

    Furthermore, Beatty highlights serious emerging risks regarding data sovereignty, consent, and safety. Because sign languages are inherently visual, training AI translation tools requires vast amounts of video data—raising critical concerns about personal privacy, digital identity ownership, and the targeted misuse of deepfake technology.

    A Vision for Deaf-Led Governance

    To prevent these technologies from further marginalizing communities, Beatty calls for a complete overhaul of how accessibility is handled in tech development. Historically, accessibility features have been treated as an afterthought—tacked onto a product right before release.

    Beatty argues that the DDBHH community must be structurally integrated into the entire lifecycle of AI development, moving from passive consumers to systemic leaders.

    “In the future, I hope DDBHH Canadians are not only users of AI,” Beatty shares. “We should be leaders, testers, researchers, educators, policy advisors, and decision-makers.”

    The ultimate goal is to see AI safely deployed to improve automated captioning accuracy, strengthen localized emergency communications, and lower barriers to public services—but strictly under a framework of cultural respect and Deaf-led governance.

    “My hope is simple,” says Beatty. “AI should not speak for DDBHH people. AI should support DDBHH people, with DDBHH leadership built in from the start.”

    Watch the full video interview below to hear Jeffrey Beatty’s complete perspective on AI policy and accessibility in Canada:

    Play Video Interview.
    Note: Video will pop up when pressing ‘Play’

    Have Your Say

    How is artificial intelligence affecting your daily access to services, employment, or education? Should the Canadian government mandate disabled and Deaf leadership when setting national AI accessibility standards?

    Leave your thoughts and experiences in the comments section below.

    About This Article

    This article was originally reported and written by Jordan Sangalang and first published by DeafDots on June 5, 2026. It is republished here by the author to support ongoing discussions about AI accessibility, Deaf leadership, and inclusive technology policy in Canada.

  • International Mother Language Day: From Recognition to Redesign in Canada

    Today is International Mother Language Day.

    Across Canada, institutions, schools, and organizations marked the occasion by celebrating the languages that shape identity and community. Notably, the Office of the Chief Accessibility Officer publicly acknowledged that communication is one of the seven priority areas under the Accessible Canada Act — and that American Sign Language (ASL), Langue des signes québécoise (LSQ), and Indigenous Sign Languages are recognized as the primary languages of Deaf people in Canada.

    This matters.

    It matters because the Accessible Canada Act formally acknowledges what Deaf communities have always known: our languages are sovereign, complete, and foundational to who we are.

    But let’s be clear.

    Deaf people did not begin existing when legislation recognized us.
    Our languages were not born when they were written into law.
    We have always been here.

    Beyond Celebration: A Strategic Opening

    International Mother Language Day is not simply a celebration of linguistic diversity. It is an opportunity — a strategic opening — to shift from recognition to redesign.

    Recognition says: We see you.
    Design says: We build with you.

    There is a profound difference.

    For generations, Canadian systems — education, healthcare, employment, media, and policy — were constructed on an assumption of speech supremacy. Deaf presence was treated as an exception to accommodate rather than a design reality to centre.

    Now, with ASL, LSQ, and Indigenous Sign Languages acknowledged within federal law, we stand at a threshold.

    The question is no longer whether our languages are valid.

    The question is:

    What will Canada look like when Deaf presence is embedded by design?

    What Does Deaf Presence by Design Mean?

    What would it mean to:

    • Build policies that begin from visual language, not retrofit it?
    • Structure organizations where sign language is not a service line item but a foundational operating modality?
    • Design businesses where Deaf professionals shape strategy, not merely participate in it?
    • Create public communications that assume visual-spatial language users from the outset?

    This is not about “inclusion.” Inclusion implies an existing structure with space made at the edges.

    This is about architectural influence.

    Deaf Canadians are not guests in this country. We are co-authors of it.

    Language as Activation

    International Mother Language Day reminds us that language is identity.

    But within the Sumain frame, language is also activation.

    When ASL is centred in a household, it is not an accommodation. It is inheritance.
    When LSQ shapes community in Québec, it is not a special feature. It is culture in motion.
    When Indigenous Sign Languages are acknowledged, we are reminded that Deaf presence has always intersected with land, nationhood, and sovereignty.

    Recognition under the Accessible Canada Act is significant. It gives us a legal foothold. It gives advocates leverage. It gives institutions direction.

    But legislation alone does not redesign landscapes.

    People do.

    Moving From Gratitude to Authorship

    This moment is an invitation — especially for Deaf leaders, entrepreneurs, educators, artists, policymakers, and families — to move beyond gratitude and into authorship.

    How will we influence:

    • The next generation of policy?
    • The structure of Deaf-led enterprises?
    • The training of architects, urban planners, and technologists?
    • The narrative Canada tells about communication, cognition, and human diversity?

    We are not waiting to belong.
    We already do.

    International Mother Language Day is a reminder that our languages are not peripheral to Canada’s story. They are integral to it.

    The future Canadian landscape — socially, economically, and politically — can be shaped with Deaf presence by design.

    The law has acknowledged our languages.

    Now we activate them.

    Start reframing now.